29 June 2015

SPIRITUALITY VERSUS PSYCHOTHERAPY VERSUS MEDICATIONS

PART ONE: SETTING THE STAGE FOR AUTHENTIC HEALING AND AWAKENING

Because I am back into the field of psychology, and have been reacquainting myself with therapy and psychotropic medications, I will be writing frequently about how psychology, psychopharmacology, and the pursuit of peace, enlightenment, wisdom, and Self-Realization, all fit together.

I first began my spiritual career through self-study of Zen and Ramana Maharshi in about 1966, almost 50 years ago.  I have lived in or been a member of endless Zen, Tibetan, Kundalini, Vedantic and other centers for at least 30 of those years.  I have treated people with psychological problems such as depression, manic-depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and schizophrenia directly for maybe 20 years, and for 30 years I have been a consultant to psychiatrists and psychologists defending their treatment of individuals according to ethical and medical standards for the court system.

I have also taught Zen and Self-Realization spirituality at the Extensions at UCLA, UCSD, UC Irvine, and UC Santa Barbara.  I was a teaching monk at the International Buddhist Meditation Center for years, and studied under six Zen masters learning hundreds if not thousands of koans and their answers.  Finally, I spent eight years with Robert Adams—a student of Ramana Maharshi—and five with Jean Dunn, one of two disciples that Nisargadatta named as successors.

During this almost 50 years of exposure to these diverse spirituality modalities and psychotherapies, I have been exposed to many, many thousands of people walking one path or another and have reached many conclusions, the most important of which is as follows.

Most people walking spiritual path do so as a result of psychological problems and the mistaken belief that spirituality can resolve psychological problems.  For them, they hold the false idea that if they were to awaken, all mood disorders such as anxiety and depression would disappear, as well as fear, such as fear of losing a loved one, or fear of death itself.  They also pursue enlightenment to increase self-esteem, decrease pessimistic and obsessive thinking, while others suffering from pre-psychotic or frankly psychotic intrusions of other-worldly states, visions, visitations from entities, hallucinations, hearing voices, or else being hyper-aware and bother by noises, smells, light, and energetic currents, seek respite through meditation, Kundalini, Chi-Gong, or other practices.

However, “awakening” and enlightenment have nothing to do with resolving psychological problems.  It works in entirely different spheres, yet people, out of fear of engaging in psychotherapy or taking psychotropic medications, spend years self-treating through spiritual practices, or reading about various famed spiritual teachers such as Ramana Maharshi, Rama Krishna, Krishnamurti, U.G. Krishnamurti, etc., and try to emulate or attain through book-learning what they think these teachers have attained, whether it be peace of mind, enlightenment, bliss, or total, benign indifference to suffering in this world.

But relief from major psychological distress and suffering cannot be obtained through typical spiritual practices except for one way: learning how to observe one’s thinking and emotions.  Self-observation can create a psychological distance between a person’s sense of self and the distressing symptoms they want to end.  They wall off their sense of self from the intrusive emotional and even physical pain.

Unfortunately, after a while, users of this technique often find they have walled off portions of their own self, from themselves, and are no longer fully functioning people without a full-spectrum of emotional richness, and without a wide range of human interactions, enjoyments, and ability to feel and to tolerate both joy and suffering.

Go to any coffee shop and you will invariably find cadres of people obsessively reading the Bible and taking notes.  They often sit together and hold Bible study classes in Starbucks or Coffee Bean establishments.

Christianity is a religion of learning how to tolerate suffering and overcoming fear of death through belief in a benevolent God in the form of God the Father and God the Son, to whom you give your suffering, and the belief if you lead a good and moral life you will live in heaven forever, free from suffering, and living in joy at Christ’s side.  For some this holding onto belief—Faith—actually works for a time, and sometimes for a long time and even a life time.  Others, not so much.

Buddhism in its original Theravadin form is profoundly pessimistic, holding that life itself is suffering, but there is a way out of suffering and that is the Eightfold path or right thinking, right living, contemplation, meditation, etc.

For most with energy gurus and many New Age spiritualities, the path usually consists to trying to attain permanently altered states of mind, such as endless bliss, joy, internal energies, Sahaja or Nirvakalpa Samadhis, where you forever dwell in states of endless bliss, peace that passes by understanding, or one dwells in the Void, emptiness, or pure awareness, the pure I Am, or some other state.  Many do obtain such states that last a long, long time, and are sustained through constant practice, mindfulness, etc.

Examples of this are the energy gurus who claim to have attained constant bliss such as many of Muktananda’s swamis, Hari Krishna swamis, the author of The Most Rapid Means to Eternal Bliss, Michael Langford, Jan Esmann, and many others, who practice Kundalini, pranayama, visualizations, and other exercises for many years in order to awaken one’s Kundalini energies and keep it awake.  Another is Eric Pepin who teaches mostly about navigating through various astral states and energy fields.

However, feeling bliss does not really resolve psychological problems, it is just that their experience is mitigated by the feeling of bliss.  Some of these energy teachers can become profoundly narcissistic and even frankly psychotic, such as Da Free John and Osho as he decompensated into frank psychosis after long-term extreme drug use. Muktananda himself died as a result of too-fast withdrawal from Valium which causes a plummeting of his blood pressure and heart failure.

I know this previous paragraph will draw huge amounts of critical comments from  former students of these teachers, as well as readers of these teachers who hold onto belief that these figures were the greatest, happiest, and wisest of beings, when in fact, many were closing in on insanity in the form of malignant narcissism. 

As my  own primary teacher, Robert Adams, said, “Insanity and enlightenment walk hand in hand.” Robert himself was profoundly withdrawn from  life and the world, finding profound peace by ignoring the world, its suffering, and activities.

This is the first introductory post on founding a truly integrated modality of healing psychological problems and finding awakening to one’s own self, or Self-Realization to both the Manifest Human Self, and to the Self as the ultimate Witness.

I will post about medications and the unfounded fears that people have about medications, such that they foster dependency, make you into a zombie, make you feel that you are sick, that therefore something is very wrong with you, further reducing self-esteem, or the belief that psychotherapy (and drugs) are a crutch, and no self-respecting person should ever seek help from a therapist, or from medications, and that one should  only life oneself by one’s own bootstraps.  This is pure poppycock.

I myself, as admitted above, have submitted myself not only do many spiritual teachers over 50 years, but also to eight years of twice a week psychotherapy in several different modalities, from Gestalt to psychoanalysis (4 X week), taken medications for depression and for anxiety, and have practiced and taught many types of meditation and of self-inquiry.  I still take a sleeping pill, sometimes several, to get to a deep sleep state because sleep apnea otherwise makes deep and REM sleep impossible.

In addition, the deep sleep, dream, and waking are all temporary states that come and go as they will,and are all affected by the health of the body as well as how long and well one has progressed in meditation.

Over the next few months I want to give you insights gained after having done it all for a half century.  I want to tell you what works, what does not, what practices or beliefs actually make for more suffering or delusion than the disorder one is trying to overcome.

Like I said near the beginning, most people practicing or even interested in spirituality, are doing so to escape suffering, and usually as an escape from psychological suffering such as depression, manic-depression, severe anxiety or persistent fears of death or pther events, escape from a pervading dread of the worst happening, low self-esteem, psychotic phenomena, or from physical pain, or even “imagined” of psychogenic pain.

These people want to do it all themselves and not take psychotropic medications, see therapists, or even go to  a spiritual teacher.  They think they can resolve their dis-ease and distress purely through the mind, book learning, self-talk, positive affirmations, belief in the Bible or Buddha, Christ or Osho, or Krishnamurti.

These people do not have any idea of how complex the problems of psychological pain and suffering are, and the many, many ways there are to resolve the suffering, but the fears of following those methods prevents true relief of that suffering.

As a taste, I will  say only one thing, one hint of what is to come.  Medication cannot resolve a deep depression, if anything, it will worsen it by divorcing yourself from feeling even more than the depression does.  The moist effective way out of depression is a combination of medication and appropriate psychotherapy.  This holds true for other mood disorders, such as manic-depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, obessional disorders, and even Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

I certainly cannot give all the answers to resolving these disorders all by yourselves, because even major depressive disorders have many different causes, and it takes a good medical evaluation to best determine the way to mitigate this type of suffering.  But psychotropic medications can often assist the spiritual seeker by freeing them of a depression, anxiety state, violent mood swings that undermine our ability to be steadfast and persistent in any successful spiritual practice.

Also, as an additional understanding I want to convey, it is almost impossible to lift yourself out of a Major Depressive Episode without psychotropic medications or psychotherapy.  It literally cannot be done through spiritual methods.


Often Major Depressive Episodes end just by the passage of time, as do strong periods of deep anxiety and panic disorders, but each untreated episode changes brain function and neurologic chemistry to the extent that there is a much higher chance of subsequent episodes, and each new episode further changes brain function and chemistry until the disorder can become chronic, and no longer requires an external trigger, such as death of a loved one or loss of a job or home.

18 comments:

  1. AWESOME, can't wait for this, Edji. And THANKS!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Edji - Your post is extremely bold and honest. I must say, I had lot of such assumptions too when I embarked on this journey. I do not know what enlightenment is but I have noticed that unearths more trauma and suffering that I anticipated. But then it does seem to help me release lot of the suffering as I accept it and allow it. I am really looking forward to your posts.
    Truly grateful - Dinesh!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The analysis is very much a conformation of my own periods of chronic anxiety which was more specifically panic disorder followed by agoraphobia. Yet the one drug, Prozac, which initially seemed like a Godsend for it, putting me into a meditative state practically most of the time became a curse some months later when it robbed me of all feeling. It was intolerable and I just said, "fuck this, I want the anxiety back!" I would add that I was also in psychiatric treatment but that didn't seem to influence anything. It became a matter of changing drugs and after tolerating the agoraphobic episodes for several years finally stumbling upon what was the most effective treatment of all even if not a 100% cure all.

      Delete
  3. Ed, looking at your last posts, (and please, correct me if I´m wrong) it seems like you are starting to dismiss the reality or at least the importance of the birthless and deathless Parabrahman, on the one hand, and astral worlds, on the other hand, which you regarded as real in some of your most memorable posts not so long ago.

    For me, the reality of Parabrahman is not debatable, since it is my experience (everyone´s experience, actually) that the whole universe is contained within Consciousness, and in turn this Consciousness is also witnessed by something absolutely impersonal which is far beyond existence, untouched by it. It is not a concept of wishful thinking. It is my experience indeed, and even though this Witness is impersonal, is also "me" in some misterious manner.

    I have no experience on astral planes or other realities, though. However, you used to thank that woman, Deeya, for teaching you the actuality of these "parallel realities", but now it seems like you are starting to dismiss them as mind tricks.

    Am i wrong? Have you changed your mind about these topics?

    Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have been watching Ed carefully since 'orange website'. The flow of "changing of the mind" and journeying through various rooms of consciousness and never standing still, being versatile and gaining diversity in many aspects of consciousness and beyond, always managing to touch students on the right subject at the time needed, etc. You just cannot catch the river as it was static...
      really remarkable to watch and learn by example.

      Delete
  4. I emphasize different teachings at different times. For example, I am now editing psychiatric reports many hours each day, so these kinds of issues come to for. When Deeya was around, I became fascinated by her world and the powers of energy healing.

    Parabrahman is old news to me since I realized that aspect of Self 20 years ago, and subsequently realized the Manifest Self, which to me is far more important and useful with regards to our lives as humans in a human world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ed....You have said "there is a fine line between enlightenment and insanity"
      Do you feel that there are a large number of patients in treatment and hospitalised who have had,in fact, an unrecognised spiritual awakening..for example of the seeing and experience of "no-self" and the void ..which the medical profession would most often claim as a psychiatric condition and treat with medication?....and that many others have had spiritual crises of various kinds which is most often suppressed with heavy handed treatment including drug therapy, where were there some understanding by the medical profession, could be treated in a much more kinder and integrated way?
      I do understand that there are psychiatric conditions that are so severe and disabling that medication is important and unavoidable,,,yet very many others where medical intervention and psychiatric treatment has at best been unhelpful and infective and at worst severally damaging.
      I myself had some experience of this...and was traumatised by medical treatment where understanding and integration of an experience was what was needed.
      I would also disagree with your statement that there is "a fine line between enlightenment and insanity" Human unconsciousness is the insanity...Beliefs are the insanity...the idea of separation is insanity.Medicating away the human condition and human emotions is insanity.
      I feel your statement puts an idea of fear into something that is beyond fear based concepts...and in fact one has to burn away all fear in the fire of grace to realise.

      Delete
    2. When there is realization of the Manifest Self, utter certainty of who and what you are are yours no matter what emotional storms may follow. They become tame things compared to your assured Self-Knowing.

      The Void is not you; identification with it is pathology, because like the Self, it is something experienced simultaneously with the Self. God, Void, the world, and Self are all viewed simultaneously from, and along with knowing "of" your Witness aspect, that which cannot be seen or experienced, and which you can only be. From that place of witness/being, all appears before you as the Manifestation.

      All else is pathology. Living the mundane life of a person living only in the world with a job, spousue, and family, is pathology.

      Living only in the delights and back alleys of mysticism, astral worlds, energies, inner light too is pathology.

      And those with depression, great anxiety, insecurity, fear, grandiosity, need for power, they are all pathology.

      The Self-Realized person needs nothing beyond basic life support of food, air, shelter, and a few simple clothes. He is like Robert, Ramana, Nisargadatta. Not concerned with recognition.

      I admit I have been concerned with recognition for some time, not out of narcissistic need, but the need to change the whole direction of current American spirituality away from the neo-advaita and new age nonsense, towards reowning the Self, first the personal self, then the Self of all.

      Delete
    3. Well yes..I agree with you there Ed about the neo-advaita and new age nonsense!
      I would like to clarify the difference between the realisation of Emptiness and the Realisation of what is termed the Self..is this not the same thing?

      In my experience there seems to be 3 main components of Awakening..at the level of Mind, Heart and Hara that is Wisdom/Love/ Immovable mountain ie rooted in Emptiness (for want of a better expression!)

      Delete
    4. Of course they are not the same thing.

      Emptiness is only thecontainer and permeator of all existence. It is observed by the Witness, the deepest aspect of Self.

      But the Manifest Self finds its home in Turiya, the deepest layer within Consciousness.

      Then there are the more superfical layers of Self such as mind, energies, thought, etc.

      Delete
  5. social psychologist Erich Fromm first coined the term "malignant narcissism" in 1964, describing it as a "severe mental sickness" representing "the quintessence of evil". He characterized the condition as "the most severe pathology and the root of the most vicious destructiveness and inhumanity".[4] Edith Weigert (1967) saw malignant narcissism as a "regressive escape from frustration by distortion and denial of reality"; while Herbert Rosenfeld (1971) described it as "a disturbing form of narcissistic personality where grandiosity is built around aggression and the destructive aspects of the self become idealized".[5]
    Edward which particular teachers do you feel meet the above diagnosis?

    ReplyDelete
  6. None of these definitions really are definitions of the disorder. The first is a moral judgement, the second a developmental definition, the third, is just a one-sided viewpoint.

    By malignant narcissism in teachers, I mean 1. those who get carried away by celebrity, and become pricks or worse, those who have a progressive grandiosity, such as Da Free John, Osho, and in ancient times, Caligula, Nero, and more recently, Hitler, Mussilini, and probably Chris Christi. Fame combined with narcissism, and hypermania, or manic depression, where the person sicks ever deeper in grandiosity because of some gift and recognition, and thinks his or her shit does not stink.

    I saw Chidvilasanda going this way when I was with her in the early 80s, and Muktananda had more than a little of this tinge.

    It is far more complicated than any of those definitions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But that same malignant narcissism would be endemic in certain fields/occuipations notably those casting one in the spotlight i.e., acting, politics, etc.but the public might be more forgiving since that so often goes with the territory.

      Delete
    2. I am not the same anon as the other anon 7.39 above.
      Really are you seriously likening Osho to Caligula,Hitler and Mussolini!
      or are you just trying to make yourself sound controversial. ?

      Delete
    3. I am saying he was flawed by a degree of narcissism that can be regarded as malignant. he died of drug addiction and from the destructive organization he created andof which he lost control because he thought he could control it by his will, or being God-favored, alone.

      His actions were self-destructive from the 94 Rolls Royce flaunting to get attentionsfor his teachings, and look at his videos--they were all personality worshiping, as bad as Da Free John's self-worship.

      His teachings are all over the place, and despite what Robert appeared to say, showed no real self-realization. he was an academic showman, not a spiritually developed individual.

      I named names and said they shared the same condition. That is the way he was similar to Hitler and Caligula. But I don't know many modern people that I am sure sufferedfrom the same condition, so I used old examples.

      No real spiritual teacher would createor tolerate the organization he created and lost control of, nor believe his own academic/intellectual bullshit constituted real spirituality. I believe that many of his followers became spiritual far deeper and many more became self-realized than he.

      He wrote many books about Zen, and therein he showed no real understanding of Zen, nor of Ramana. He was an observer of enlightenment, not a participant in it.

      The good he did was to open up spirituality

      Delete
    4. ...in a way that no one else did. He performed a minor miracle there because of the boldness that flowed from his barcissism.

      Delete
    5. ...in a way that no one else did. He performed a minor miracle there because of the boldness that flowed from his barcissism.

      Delete
    6. I am saying he was flawed by a degree of narcissism that can be regarded as malignant. he died of drug addiction and from the destructive organization he created andof which he lost control because he thought he could control it by his will, or being God-favored, alone.

      His actions were self-destructive from the 94 Rolls Royce flaunting to get attentionsfor his teachings, and look at his videos--they were all personality worshiping, as bad as Da Free John's self-worship.

      His teachings are all over the place, and despite what Robert appeared to say, showed no real self-realization. he was an academic showman, not a spiritually developed individual.

      I named names and said they shared the same condition. That is the way he was similar to Hitler and Caligula. But I don't know many modern people that I am sure sufferedfrom the same condition, so I used old examples.

      No real spiritual teacher would createor tolerate the organization he created and lost control of, nor believe his own academic/intellectual bullshit constituted real spirituality. I believe that many of his followers became spiritual far deeper and many more became self-realized than he.

      He wrote many books about Zen, and therein he showed no real understanding of Zen, nor of Ramana. He was an observer of enlightenment, not a participant in it.

      The good he did was to open up spirituality

      Delete